impfan wrote:
arnoldrimmer wrote:
redclanger wrote:
Uh-oh - we debated the semantics of agenda last year and some people got banned as a result.
Blimey.
Yes I can see the definitions but the fact is people aren't using them like it. To suggest "an agenda" it seems is to suggest an underlying work in progress to move against the status quo and effectively wish to harm the club or Trust. It always seems though that the only people who get the "agenda" tag are those who are not happy with the current set-up. Funny that! 
I think No3 of the 2nd description is very accurate of what is actually happening though. Just my opinion.
The phrase is being used as a weapon though. Again, just my opinion, like yours mate.