EddieDillsworth wrote:
Stalin wrote:
Its semantics really based on principles to divide - now thats an agenda in action.
I don't want to have an argument nor do I any intention or desire to divide. I'm sorry if you think that. I really don't see how you can accuse me of being divisive when I'm merely pointing out that if you favour an IPS you may not favour a PLC. The two are based around totally different philosophies for a company, rather like socialism and capitalism in a sociological context. That's all, nothing more nothing less, no wrongs no rights.
You could however argue that a PLC (or maybe a CIC - community interest company) might be more wideranging in it's ownership by supporters as well as businesses than the model we have now.
It's an argument, nothing more.That might be cloud cuckoo land, but it's an argument for a PLC system, with many obvious drawbacks given the club's current status and position.