Dean B wrote:
Davethe cardboardbox wrote:
350k is a bit more like it and a lot better than 100k!
Good luck to him.
Sure the Cowleys will have known he was likely to leave and will have planned accordingly.
When you consider his goal against Burnley earnt us around 1.5 million the guy will have brought in nearly 2 million plus he played a huge part in our promotion, not bad when you consider he's far from the finished article.
They did know months ago he was going to leave, so many clubs interested in him sooner rather than later.
The 100k is so funny seems someone got the release clause wrong.
What release clause? The club has said offers will have to match their valuation. That does not sound like a release clause.The press association say there is a release clause. Where do they get confidential information like that they are not privy to what is in his contract any more than you or I. The player the club and his agent will know, despite what many think of agents they will do their best for their player but they are bound by confidentiality.
I have to agree with you Dean, nothing has been mentioned by The Club about any release clause, and Danny did say City would be holding out for the best offer for the club.
Personally I think Raggett is good in the air, but his passing leaves a lot to be desired.
Waterfall his control of the ball in the 2015/16 season also left a lot to be desired, but this last season he showed he had come on with his ball control 100%, so Raggett could get that side of his game together as he improves,but not if he's only a bench warmer, as Marggets knows only too well.